What’s Wrong with the September Issue of Artforum

Artforum, the September issue
Artforum, the September issue

In an article published on the New York website today, Jerry Saltz weighs in on a major problem with the new issue of Artforum, and by extension, the art world more generally. Saltz observes that of the 73 ads in the September issue of Artforum, only eleven, ELEVEN – are for solo shows by women.  He says:

“The magazine is telling us that the top two-thirds of the art world are mired in self-perpetuating, self-replicating sexism: More art by men is shown and sold in large galleries because more art by men has been shown and sold in large galleries. And the result is not just about what gets shown, but what that teaches us about what is worth showing: the art world as seen in these ads is much more comfortable digesting strange, weird, surprising, and even insane work from men, but gets squeamish whenever women try to show at all”.

Let’s not forget that the sidelining of women isn’t exclusive to the arts industry either.  Why not top things off with a trawl through 100% Men.  Angry?  Me too.

What’s Wrong with the September Issue of Artforum

One thought on “What’s Wrong with the September Issue of Artforum

  1. Jennifer Buckley says:

    Hello Lovely Lamb Legs Congratulations on your new role at NGV. Send me your new contact details when you have a chance. LOVED (hated) this post …

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s